Skip to content
Optionomics Free · No account needed

Options flow · Lithium Argentina AG

LAR options flow

Last full session · September 24, 2026 · Delayed and summarised

Where the premium went

Call premium minus put premium, session by session.

15 sessions
May 21: $21.6K more on calls May 26: $15.5K more on puts Jun 1: $29.9K more on calls Jun 2: $31.6K more on puts Jun 30: $15.5K more on puts Jul 13: $0 more on calls Jul 22: $0 more on calls Jul 29: $0 more on calls Aug 4: $31.5K more on puts Aug 6: $0 more on calls Aug 7: $17.2K more on calls Aug 11: $80.0K more on calls Aug 13: $0 more on calls Aug 25: $43.3K more on calls Sep 24: $13.5K more on puts More on calls More on puts Largest net: $80.0K May 21 Sep 24

Above zero: more spent on calls. Below zero: more on puts. Bar heights share a scale within this stock's history; premium alone does not tell us whether a trade was bought or sold.

Put the activity in context

Derived readings from the same completed session.

Relative options cost

100%
100%

Options are unusually expensive — higher than 100% of the last year for this stock

Most is riding on $5.00 and $7.50
the prices with the most contracts still open above and below
Trading far below its 52-week high
-17.8% over the last month
How to read these figures

Every reading here is one we computed from that session. The history plots the difference between aggregate call and put premium, scaled to the largest absolute reading in this window.

Institutional-looking activity is inferred from trade size and shape. Sweeps span multiple venues. Neither tells us who traded or guarantees a directional move.

Relative options cost compares this stock with its own past year. It is not the stock's implied volatility quoted as a percentage.