10-Q · May 8, 2026
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation reported strong Q1 2026 results, with revenue of $82.5 million and EPS of $0.80, marking significant year-over-year growth. The company's net interest income rose significantly…
Earnings analysis · 10-Q
Filed August 7, 2026 · Our reading of the company's report
The latest report
Second-quarter diluted EPS of $0.85 improved from $0.80 in the prior quarter and $0.45 a year earlier, while revenue of $86.052 million modestly exceeded consensus. The filing does not provide enough information to…
Second-quarter diluted EPS of $0.85 improved from $0.80 in the prior quarter and $0.45 a year earlier, while revenue of $86.052 million modestly exceeded consensus. The filing does not provide enough information to calculate gross margin, operating margin, free cash flow, working-capital changes, or segment performance. Interest-rate exposure is the main filing-specific concern: management describes the balance sheet as modestly liability sensitive in the near term, with modeled NII pressure under rising rates and more pronounced second-year pressure under falling rates. No material changes to the prior 10-K risk factors or quantitative forward guidance were disclosed.
How much of each revenue dollar the business keeps.
One point per quarterly or annual filing. Both margins are shares of that report's revenue.
Our analysis across the last few reports.
Our model's reading of each filing, not the share price or the market's reaction. Annual and quarterly reports each occupy one position.
Diluted EPS was $0.85, up from $0.80 in the prior quarter and $0.45 in the year-ago quarter, although it was below the $0.87 consensus estimate.
Reported revenue was $86.052 million, exceeding the $85.301 million consensus estimate by approximately $0.751 million, or 0.9%.
The company uses interest-rate swaps to manage liability duration; the primary swap program had $280.0 million of notional value outstanding at June 30, 2026.
The commercial lending back-to-back swap program had $405.9 million of notional value executed and outstanding with borrowers as of June 30, 2026.
The company maintained an authorization to repurchase up to 880,000 shares through December 31, 2026, with 680,000 shares remaining available at June 30, 2026.
Management characterized the company as modestly liability sensitive in the near term: an immediate and sustained 100-basis-point rate increase would reduce first-year net interest income by 1.1%, while a 200-basis-point decrease would reduce second-year net interest income by 8.8%.
The filing states that interest-rate simulation models assume the balance-sheet composition remains constant and apply rate changes uniformly across the yield curve; actual results may differ from the modeled 1.1% first-year NII decline under a 100-basis-point increase.
The company disclosed no material changes to the risk factors in its December 31, 2025 Form 10-K, so existing credit, liquidity, market and operational risks remain applicable without a new filing-specific update.
No quantitative forward revenue or EPS guidance, outlook revision, or other numerical outlook was provided in the filing.
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation reported strong Q1 2026 results, with revenue of $82.5 million and EPS of $0.80, marking significant year-over-year growth. The company's net interest income rose significantly…
Peapack-Gladstone’s 2025 10-K emphasizes a deposit-led, relationship-driven private banking strategy, continued expansion in Metro New York (NYC flagship opened April 2025) and a growing wealth business (AUM $13.1…
Peapack-Gladstone reported quarter with total revenue (net interest income before provision + other income) of $64,359,000, up $11,283,000 or 21.3% year-over-year, but net income and EPS declined to $7,595,000 and $0.43…
Peapack-Gladstone positions itself as a relationship-focused regional bank with a diversified mix anchored by a wealth management division ($11.9 billion AUM as of 12/31/2024) and targeted expansion into the New York…
This is our reading of a public filing, not the filing itself. Analysis can contain errors; check the source document for full context.