10-Q · May 28, 2026
PagerDuty reported Q1 FY2027 earnings with revenue of $120.97 million, slightly up 1% from $119.81 million in the prior year. However, the earnings per share (EPS) declined to $0.10 from $0.13 a year prior, indicating a…
Earnings analysis · 10-Q
Filed August 27, 2026 · Our reading of the company's report
The latest report
The extracted 10-Q section does not include the income statement, balance sheet, cash flow statement, segment disclosures, or MD&A, so revenue, margins, EPS, cash flow, and working-capital trends cannot be verified from…
The extracted 10-Q section does not include the income statement, balance sheet, cash flow statement, segment disclosures, or MD&A, so revenue, margins, EPS, cash flow, and working-capital trends cannot be verified from the filing text provided. The principal update is a restructuring that reduced headcount by approximately 15%, alongside CEO and CFO transitions. Share repurchases totaled 799,112 shares in the quarter, while management reported effective disclosure controls and no material changes in internal controls.
How much of each revenue dollar the business keeps.
One point per quarterly or annual filing. Both margins are shares of that report's revenue.
Our analysis across the last few reports.
Our model's reading of each filing, not the share price or the market's reaction. Annual and quarterly reports each occupy one position.
The company repurchased 799,112 shares during the three months ended July 31, 2026, including 441,858 shares in July at an average price of $10.14.
PagerDuty’s board authorized a common-stock repurchase program of up to $100.0 million in May 2026; approximately $92.398 million remained available at July 31, 2026.
Management concluded that disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of July 31, 2026.
The company stated that there were no material changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended July 31, 2026.
In August 2026, the company reallocated roles and realigned teams, resulting in an approximately 15% reduction in headcount. PagerDuty cautions that restructuring may create additional costs, disrupt operations, reduce employee morale, and impair productivity if expected savings are not achieved.
PagerDuty disclosed substantial senior-management turnover: Jennifer Tejada’s CEO succession was announced in May 2026, and Eric Prengel was appointed CFO in June 2026 following the planned retirement of Howard Wilson announced in November 2025.
The company has no key-person insurance on any employees and warns that losing senior management or other key employees could harm the business or create difficulty finding adequate replacements.
The company’s $100.0 million repurchase authorization may be suspended, modified, or terminated at any time, and $92.398 million remained available at July 31, 2026, representing ongoing capital allocation exposure.
The extracted 10-Q does not provide quantitative guidance or a comparable prior outlook. The filing references no guidance change; numeric Q3 and FY2027 guidance was provided in the accompanying earnings release rather than the extracted 10-Q.
PagerDuty reported Q1 FY2027 earnings with revenue of $120.97 million, slightly up 1% from $119.81 million in the prior year. However, the earnings per share (EPS) declined to $0.10 from $0.13 a year prior, indicating a…
PagerDuty positions itself as a mission-critical Operations Cloud for digital operations, emphasizing investments in generative AI (PagerDuty Advance), an extensive integration ecosystem, and a shift to usage-based…
PagerDuty returned to GAAP profitability in the quarter ended July 31, 2025, reporting revenue of $123,411,000 and diluted EPS of $0.10. Gross margin expanded to 84.6% and income from operations turned positive at…
PagerDuty's Q1 2025 results show a positive revenue trend with actual revenue of $119.8M, reflecting a 7.3% increase from $111.2M a year ago. The company made progress in reducing its net loss to $(7.2)M compared to…
This is our reading of a public filing, not the filing itself. Analysis can contain errors; check the source document for full context.