10-Q · May 5, 2026
Everest Group's Q1 2026 results show significant improvement with net income of $653 million, or $16.08 EPS, surpassing the estimate of $13.99. Revenue was reported at $3.57 billion, a slight increase from the previous…
Earnings analysis · 10-Q
EG earnings analysis
Filed August 3, 2026 · Our reading of the company's report
The latest report
Everest reported Q2 2026 total revenue of $3.961 billion, down 11.8% year over year and roughly 2.7% sequentially, while net income declined to $559 million and diluted EPS was $14.85. Core underwriting remained…
Read full summary
Everest reported Q2 2026 total revenue of $3.961 billion, down 11.8% year over year and roughly 2.7% sequentially, while net income declined to $559 million and diluted EPS was $14.85. Core underwriting remained profitable, led by a $283 million Reinsurance Treaty underwriting gain and lower first-half catastrophe losses of $181 million versus $554 million a year ago, but Q2 combined ratio worsened to 92.0% and premium volume contracted. Balance-sheet capital was broadly stable, with shareholders' equity of $15.430 billion and debt of $3.589 billion, while first-half operating cash flow fell to $939 million from $2.0 billion.
Gross and operating margin
How much of each revenue dollar the business keeps.
One point per quarterly or annual filing. Both margins are shares of that report's revenue.
Where revenue came from
The business segments reported by the company.
Shares of the segments disclosed in this filing, largest first.
How we read each report
Our analysis across the last few reports.
Our model's reading of each filing, not the share price or the market's reaction. Annual and quarterly reports each occupy one position.
Reported figures
- Earnings per share
- $14.85
What stood out
-
Profitable quarter despite lower revenue
Q2 net income was $559 million ($14.85 diluted EPS), with total revenue of $3.961 billion. Revenue declined 11.8% from $4.491 billion a year ago and approximately 2.7% from Q1 2026 revenue of $4.07 billion; EPS was down approximately 7.8% year over year and 8.4% sequentially from $16.21.
-
Treaty underwriting remains strong
Reinsurance Treaty produced a $283 million underwriting gain and an 88.5% combined ratio in Q2. First-half underwriting gain rose to $598 million from $291 million, as the six-month combined ratio improved 6.7 points to 87.8%.
-
Wholesale loss experience improved
Global Wholesale & Specialty gross written premiums were essentially stable at $958 million, up $1 million year over year, while its loss ratio improved 2.7 points to 62.0%. The segment's Q2 underwriting gain was $34 million.
-
Lower catastrophe burden supports H1
First-half catastrophe losses fell to $181 million from $554 million in the prior-year period, helping the consolidated six-month combined ratio improve to 91.5% from 96.4%.
-
Book value growth and active buybacks
Book value per share increased 5.0% to $398.83 at June 30, 2026 from $379.83 at December 31, 2025. The company also repurchased $725 million of stock in the first six months of 2026.
-
Modeled catastrophe exposure reduced
The company's largest modeled 1-in-100-year net economic loss declined to approximately 8.1% of June 30, 2026 shareholders' equity, versus approximately 11.0% at December 31, 2025.
What to watch
-
Premium contraction and higher cessions
Premium volume contracted materially: total gross written premiums fell 19.4% to $3.772 billion and net written premiums fell 26.3% to $3.037 billion. Reinsurance Treaty net written premiums declined $557 million (20.0%), partly due to increased third-party cessions through Annapurna Re.
-
Q2 catastrophe and margin pressure
Quarterly underwriting profitability weakened: the consolidated combined ratio rose 1.6 points to 92.0%, while Reinsurance Treaty's combined ratio increased 3.6 points to 88.5%. Q2 catastrophe losses were $120 million, versus $20 million a year earlier.
-
Operating cash flow and liquidity declined
Operating cash flow fell to $939 million for the first six months of 2026 from $2.0 billion a year earlier. Cash and short-term investments decreased to $3.6 billion at June 30 from $4.3 billion at year-end, although total debt remained $3.589 billion.
-
New BMA group-supervision requirements
The BMA formally determined it will become group supervisor, with Bermuda Re designated for group-level compliance. The transition period ends in January 2027 and may be extended up to an additional 12 months; management says the regime could raise compliance costs and affect capital, borrowing terms and ratings.
-
Legacy runoff support is temporary
Legacy remains loss-making despite runoff: it recorded a $36 million Q2 underwriting loss, and the $30 million quarterly AIG transition-service credit is expected to continue only through Q3 2026 before ceasing.
-
Large reserve base and catastrophe exposure
Reserve and catastrophe uncertainty remains material: gross loss and LAE reserves increased to $34.735 billion from $34.312 billion at year-end, and the Southeast U.S. wind 1-in-100-year gross PML is $1.837 billion.
Management's outlook
The 10-Q does not provide quantitative revenue or EPS guidance. Management states it generally expects annual positive operating cash flow, while noting cash flow could decline or become negative near term if significant catastrophe claims are paid.
Earlier filings 4
10-K · February 26, 2026
Everest (EG) reports a strong capital base and a clear strategic shift toward core reinsurance and wholesale/specialty insurance after selling renewal rights to AIG. The 2025 filing highlights $17.7 billion of gross…
10-Q · October 31, 2025
Everest Group reported Q3 2025 total revenues of $4,319 million, roughly flat versus Q3 2024 ($4,285 million), but profitability weakened materially: income before taxes fell to $269 million and net income to $255…
10-Q · August 1, 2025
Everest Group reported Q2 2025 total revenues of $4,491 million (premiums earned $3,991 million) versus $4,227 million in Q2 2024, and diluted EPS of $16.10 for the quarter. Underwriting results showed a modest…
This is our reading of a public filing, not the filing itself. Analysis can contain errors; check the source document for full context.