Skip to content
Optionomics Free · No account needed

Earnings analysis · 10-Q

CPS earnings analysis

Filed May 7, 2026 · Our reading of the company's report

The latest report

Cooper-Standard reported Q1 2026 earnings with revenue of $686.4 million, surpassing estimates, but posted a higher-than-expected loss per share of $(0.29). The company faces challenges from high debt refinancing costs…

Read full summary

Cooper-Standard reported Q1 2026 earnings with revenue of $686.4 million, surpassing estimates, but posted a higher-than-expected loss per share of $(0.29). The company faces challenges from high debt refinancing costs and operational losses despite small revenue growth year-over-year.

Read the original on SEC.gov

Gross and operating margin

How much of each revenue dollar the business keeps.

15% Gross margin Operating margin Nov 2020 May 2026

One point per quarterly or annual filing. Both margins are shares of that report's revenue.

From revenue to operating profit

Where each $100 of revenue went in this report.

Of every $100 of revenue Cost of sales $87 Operating expenses $9 Left as operating profit $4

Cost of sales, operating expenses, and what remained. Figures are rounded to whole dollars.

How we read each report

Our analysis across the last few reports.

Read as bullish Read as bearish Nov 2020 May 2026

Our model's reading of each filing, not the share price or the market's reaction. Annual and quarterly reports each occupy one position.

Reported figures

Earnings per share
$-0.29
Segment
Sealing Systems segment: $348.3M; Fluid Handling: $317.9M

What stood out

  • Revenue Growth Amid Challenges

    Revenue increased 2.9% year-over-year to $686.4 million, exceeding estimates of $657 million.

  • Improved Gross Margin

    Gross margin improved to 12.0% from 11.6% in the prior year, reflecting operational savings.

  • Fluid Handling Systems Segment Strong

    Fluid Handling Systems segment revenue grew by $13.9 million to $317.9 million driven by favorable volume and mix.

  • Effective Cost Management Initiatives

    Lean initiatives contributed to operational savings, offsetting a portion of higher inflation in labor costs.

  • Debt Refinancing Completed

    Successfully completed refinancing transactions, although incurring $24.2 million in losses.

  • Cash Flow Improvement in Investing Activities

    Capital expenditures increased to $24 million from $17.5 million Y/Y, part of disciplined spending approach.

What to watch

  • Significant Net Loss

    Q1 2026 recorded a net loss of $(33.3) million compared to a profit of $1.6 million in Q1 2025.

  • Negative Operating Cash Flow

    Net cash used in operations was $69.2 million in Q1 2026, a deterioration from $(14.9) million in Q1 2025.

  • High Interest Burden

    Interest expense increased significantly to $28.3 million, reflecting the impact of recent refinancing actions.

Management's outlook

The company anticipates a challenging operating environment for 2026 but aims to meet or exceed its targets, with more guidance expected in Q2 results.

Earlier filings 4

10-K · February 13, 2026

Cooper‑Standard (CPS) positions itself as a global leader in sealing systems and a top supplier in fluid handling, emphasizing operational excellence (CSOS), digital/AI adoption and materials innovation (Fortrex®,…

10-Q · August 1, 2025

Cooper‑Standard reported Q2 sales of $705.973M, essentially flat vs. Q2 2024 ($708.362M) while gross profit improved to $93.051M (13.2% margin) and operating income rose to $37.279M (5.3% margin). GAAP diluted loss per…

10-K · February 16, 2024

The 2023 10-K emphasizes Cooper‑Standard’s market leadership in sealing and fluid-handling products, its R&D-driven product roadmap (Fortrex™, PlastiCool®, etc.) and ongoing operational programs (CSOS) that management…

10-Q · November 3, 2023

Cooper-Standard reported Q3 sales of $736,038,000, up $78,885,000 (12.0%) year-over-year, delivering gross profit of $106,534,000 (14.5% margin) and operating profit of $52,658,000 versus an operating loss of…

This is our reading of a public filing, not the filing itself. Analysis can contain errors; check the source document for full context.