Skip to content
Optionomics Free · No account needed

Earnings analysis · 10-Q

BKKT earnings analysis

Filed August 10, 2026 · Our reading of the company's report

The latest report

Bakkt delivered a substantial GAAP EPS beat at $1.94 versus $0.07 expected, but the result was heavily supported by a $98.5 million non-cash warrant gain and contrasted with an $11.8 million adjusted EBITDA loss.…

Read full summary

Bakkt delivered a substantial GAAP EPS beat at $1.94 versus $0.07 expected, but the result was heavily supported by a $98.5 million non-cash warrant gain and contrasted with an $11.8 million adjusted EBITDA loss. Revenue fell to $170.1 million from $578 million a year earlier and missed the $340.5 million estimate by approximately 50%. Management maintained its approximately $2.5 billion 2026 transaction-volume and approximately 25,000 December 2026 MAU outlook, but litigation exposure includes a potential $19 million counterclaim and an active appeal.

Read the original on SEC.gov

Reported figures

Earnings per share
$1.94

What stood out

  • GAAP EPS beat aided by non-cash gain

    GAAP EPS was $1.94 versus a $0.07 consensus estimate and improved from a $2.16 loss in Q2 2025. The reported result included a $98.5 million non-cash gain on Transchem warrants, limiting the quality of the earnings beat.

  • Revenue fell sharply and missed estimates

    Revenue was $170.1 million, down approximately 70.6% from $578 million in Q2 2025 and approximately 30.3% from $244 million in Q1 2026. Revenue also missed the $340.5 million consensus estimate by approximately 50%.

  • Transaction volume outlook maintained

    Transaction volume reached $410.0 million during the quarter, while management maintained its approximately $2.5 billion 2026 transaction-volume expectation.

  • Product launches remain targeted for Q4

    Management continues to target approximately 25,000 MAUs in December 2026, with initial co-branded card and Neobank-as-a-Service offerings targeted for Q4 2026.

  • No material control weaknesses reported

    The Company stated that its disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2026, and reported no changes that materially affected internal control over financial reporting during the quarter.

What to watch

  • Underlying losses and earnings quality

    Adjusted EBITDA loss widened to $11.8 million despite reported GAAP EPS of $1.94, indicating that underlying operating performance remained loss-making and the earnings result was materially affected by the $98.5 million non-cash warrant gain.

  • Appeal creates litigation exposure

    The Company is seeking approximately $10 million plus attorneys’ fees from Roman, while Roman has asserted counterclaims totaling up to $19 million. Roman filed an appeal on August 6, 2026, and briefing is underway.

  • Severe revenue contraction

    Revenue declined approximately 70.6% year over year, from $578 million to $170.1 million, and missed consensus by approximately 50%, highlighting significant top-line volatility.

  • Litigation could affect financial condition

    The 10-Q states that an unfavorable litigation resolution could materially affect future business, results of operations, or financial condition, while the maximum stated Roman counterclaims total $19 million.

  • No formal risk-factor update

    No material changes were reported to the risk factors from the December 31, 2025 Form 10-K or March 31, 2026 Form 10-Q; however, the pending appeal and claims of up to $19 million remain active legal exposures.

Management's outlook

Management maintained expectations for approximately $2.5 billion of 2026 transaction volume and approximately 25,000 December 2026 MAUs. Initial co-branded card and Neobank-as-a-Service offerings remain targeted for Q4 2026, subject to product, partner and regulatory requirements.

Earlier filings 1

10-Q · May 11, 2026

Bakkt, Inc. reported a significant decline in Q1 revenue to $243.6 million, down 77.1% from $1.1 billion in Q1 2025, leading to a net loss of $11.7 million compared to a profit of $19.4 million in the prior-year…

This is our reading of a public filing, not the filing itself. Analysis can contain errors; check the source document for full context.